Vesuliria AVT · Analyze · Verify · Trace
Ask questions of your institution's data in plain language. Vesuliria AVT returns the answer together with where every number came from, which statistical test it passed, and a signature. Months later, the same result can be recomputed. It runs inside your environment; data never leaves.
The problem
In typical AI analytics tools the model writes numbers into the text itself, redefines metrics every time and mistakes the largest difference for a cause. The answer looks right, but when an auditor asks “where did this number come from?” there is nothing to show.
How it works
The model understands the question, forms hypotheses and writes the text. Numbers are produced by tested, audited code. This separation makes every figure traceable.
Resolves which metric and period you mean. If ambiguous, it asks instead of guessing.
Missing periods, broken records or drift stop the analysis or lower its confidence.
Pre-registers hypotheses; difference-in-differences, power analysis and multiple-testing correction eliminate false findings.
Every number is linked to its source; the report is signed and logged.
Auditability
Every report is digitally signed and sealed. A single changed character fails verification.
A copy of the source data and the calculation code can be archived; “Recompute statistics” reproduces the result.
From finding to test, query and SQL in one click. Rejected hypotheses stay on record with their reasons.
Enterprise
The AI model can run on your own servers. Outbound calls can be disabled entirely by configuration.
SSO (OIDC) sign-in and SCIM provisioning of users and groups from Entra ID / Okta.
Analyst, auditor and admin roles. A single finding can be shared without exposing the full report or queries.
Every view, share and deletion is written to a hash-chained log. EU AI Act mapping included.
Measured results
Measured on a synthetic credit portfolio with known true drivers and on public real-world datasets.
| Measure | Result |
|---|---|
| True-driver detection (F1) — naive “largest difference” method: 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Invented (unsourced) numbers | 0 |
| Correct behavior: answer / clarify / refuse (111 questions) | 111 / 111 |
| False alarms with no signal (100 trials) | 2 / 100 |
| Core question set with a small on-premise model (7B) | 27 / 27 |
| “No driver” case on real credit-card data (UCI) | Correctly identified |
Measurements are on synthetic and public datasets; validation on institutional data is the purpose of the pilot program.
Who it is for
Tested answers to “why did non-performing loans rise, and which segment drove it?”
Source, test and signature for every figure; independent recomputation later.
Removes the “the AI made it up” risk from analyses going to regulators and the board.
Banks, participation banks, finance, factoring and leasing companies, insurers and regulated fintechs.
Pilot program
The product works and has been measured; now we want to validate its value on real institutional data together. The pilot runs inside your institution, under your control.
Contact
A live demo with your own example question, and an honest assessment of whether a pilot makes sense.